=============== Creating Models =============== A model represents the data which the application will use and takes care of the interaction to that data. In OPNsense most of the relevant data is physically stored in an xml structure (config.xml). The primary goal for OPNsense models is to structure the use of configuration data, by creating a clear abstraction layer. In this chapter we will explain how models are designed and build. ------------------- Designing the model ------------------- Creating models for OPNsense is divided into two separate blocks: #. A php class describing the actions on our data (also acts as a wrapper to our data), #. The definition of the data and the rules it should apply to. Every model's class should be derived from OPNsense\\Base\\BaseModel, a very simple model without any (additional) logic is defined with: .. code-block:: php //myManufacturer/myModule A description of this model (metadata) /^([0-9]){0,1}$/ 5 you should input a number from 0 to 9 you should input a valid email address! Now let's explain what's happing here one tag at a time. #. the tag is used for identification of the file. (this is a model file) #. Next in line is the tag, this tells the system where this information lives in the configuration file, in this case ROOT\_tag/myManufacturer/myModule #. If desired, there is some space reserved to explain the usage of the model, the tag #. Last item on the top of our list is the tag, this is where the magic begins. The content of a items tag describes the full tree based structure which holds our data, in theory this could be as large as you want it to be, but keep in mind that the content for your model should be logical and understandable. Every node in the tree could have a type, which defines it's behavior, nodes without a type are just containers. From top to bottom we find the following nodes in our tree: - exampleNumber, defined as a TextField - Mask, validation can be performed by a regex expression, this sets the expression - Default, this field is default filled with a number: 5 - ValidationMessage, when validation fails, this message is returned - contacts, this is a container - entity, is defined as a recurring item, which holds the next items - email, defined as an EmailField - when validation fails, the **ValidationMessage** is returned - name, defined as a TextField without any validations - someText, not part of the entity tag and also defined as text without validation The fieldtypes are easily extendable in the base system and they all live in their own namespace at *OPNsense\\Base\\FieldTypes* deriving from *BaseField*. ------------- Usage example ------------- Now let's test our model using a small php script (in /usr/local/opnsense/mvc/script/ ): .. code-block:: php exampleNumber =1; $myMdl->contacts->someText = "just a test";   // add a new contact node $node = $myMdl->contacts->entity->add(); $node->email = "test@test.com"; $node->name = "my test user";   // perform validation on the data in our model $validationMessages = $myMdl->performValidation(); foreach ($validationMessages as $messsage) { echo "validation failure on field ". $messsage->getField()." returning message : ". $messsage->getMessage()."\n"; }   // if validation succeeded, write data back to config if ($validationMessages->count() == 0) { // serialize our model to the config file (config.xml) // (this raises an error on validation failures) $myMdl->serializeToConfig(); $cnf = Config::getInstance(); $cnf->save(); } If you fill in an invalid value to one of the validated fields, you can easily try the validation. Try to input the text "X" into the field exampleNumber to try out. When inspecting our config.xml file, you will notice the following content has been added to the root: .. code-block:: xml 1 test@test.com my test user just a test ---------- Guidelines ---------- .. rubric:: Some (simple) guidelines developing models :name: some-simple-guidelines-developing-models #. One model should always be completely responsible for the its mount point, so if there's a model at mount point /A/B there can't be a model at /A/B/C #. Try to keep models logical and understandable, it's better to build two models for you application if the content of two parts aren't related to each other. It's no issue to create models at deeper levels of the structure. #. When using more models in a application/module, you might want to consider the following naming convention: /Vendor/Module/Model #. Try to avoid more disc i/o actions than necessary, only call save() if you actually want to save content, serializeToConfig just keeps the data in memory.