Archives
/
readability
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

fix error in testing "lwn-01"

Browse Source
pull/530/head
Radhi Fadlillah 5 years ago committed by Gijs
parent df95c9d717
commit 3e025d58e5
2 changed files with 91 additions and 18 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File

86
test/test-pages/lwn-1/expected.html
Unescape Escape View File

@ -55,13 +55,84 @@ curves</a>, refactoring data sets, and more. </p>
<p>QGIS is one of those rare free-software applications that is both powerful enough for high-end work and yet also straightforward to use for the simple tasks that might attract a newcomer to GIS in the first place. The 2.8 release, particularly with its project-wide commitment to long-term support, appears to be an update well worth checking out, whether one needs to create a simple, custom map or to mine a database for obscure geo-referenced meaning. </p>
<p><a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637533/#Comments">Comments (3 posted)</a> </p>
<h2><a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637735/">Development activity in LibreOffice and OpenOffice</a></h2>
<p> By <b>Jonathan Corbet</b> <br/>March 25, 2015 </p>
<p> By <b>Jonathan Corbet</b>
<br />March 25, 2015 </p>
<p> The LibreOffice project was <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/407383/">announced</a> with great fanfare in September 2010. Nearly one year later, the OpenOffice.org project (from which LibreOffice was forked) <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/446093/">was
cut loose from Oracle</a> and found a new home as an Apache project. It is fair to say that the rivalry between the two projects in the time since then has been strong. Predictions that one project or the other would fail have not been borne out, but that does not mean that the two projects are equally successful. A look at the two projects' development communities reveals some interesting differences. </p>
cut loose from Oracle</a> and found a new home as an Apache project. It is fair to say that the rivalry between the two projects in the time since then has been strong. Predictions that one project or the other would fail have not been borne out, but that does not mean that the two projects are equally successful. A look at the two projects' development communities reveals some interesting differences.
</p>
<h4>Release histories</h4>
<p> Apache OpenOffice has made two releases in the past year: <a href="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/the_apache_openoffice_project_announce">4.1</a> in April 2014 and <a href="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announcing_apache_openoffice_4_1">4.1.1</a> (described as "a micro update" in the release announcement) in August. The main feature added during that time would appear to be significantly improved accessibility support. </p>
<p> The release history for LibreOffice tells a slightly different story: </p>
<blockquote> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Release</th>
<th>Date</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/04/10/libreoffice-4-2-3-is-now-available-for-download/">4.2.3</a></td>
<td>April 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/04/29/the-document-foundation-announces-libreoffice-4-1-6/">4.1.6</a></td>
<td>April 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/05/08/libreoffice-4-2-4-at-linuxtag-and-fisl/">4.2.4</a></td>
<td>May 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/06/20/libreoffice-4-2-5-hits-the-marketplace/">4.2.5</a></td>
<td>June 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/07/30/libreoffice-4-3-today-you-cant-own-a-better-office-suite/">4.3</a></td>
<td>July 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/08/05/libreoffice-4-2-6-is-ready/">4.2.6</a></td>
<td>August 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/08/28/libreoffice-4-3-1-fresh-announced/">4.3.1</a></td>
<td>August 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/09/25/libreoffice-4-3-2-hits-the-marketplace-just-before-the-fourth-anniversary-of-the-project/">4.3.2</a></td>
<td>September 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/10/30/the-document-foundation-announces-libreoffice-4-3-3-and-libreoffice-4-2-7/">4.2.7/4.3.3</a></td>
<td>October 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/11/14/the-document-foundation-announces-libreoffice-4-3-4/">4.3.4</a></td>
<td>November 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/12/12/the-document-foundation-announces-libreoffice-4-2-8/">4.2.8</a></td>
<td>December 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/12/18/the-document-foundation-announces-libreoffice-4-3-5/">4.3.5</a></td>
<td>December 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2015/01/29/libreoffice-4-4-the-most-beautiful-libreoffice-ever/">4.4</a></td>
<td>January 2015</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2015/02/20/the-document-foundation-announces-libreoffice-4-3-6/">4.3.6</a></td>
<td>February 2015</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2015/02/26/libreoffice-4-4-1-fresh-is-available-for-download/">4.4.1</a></td>
<td>February 2015</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<p> It seems clear that LibreOffice has maintained a rather more frenetic release cadence, generally putting out at least one release per month. The project typically keeps at least two major versions alive at any one time. Most of the releases are of the minor, bug-fix variety, but there have been two major releases in the last year as well. </p>
<h4>Development statistics</h4>
<p> In the one-year period since late March 2014, there have been 381 changesets committed to the OpenOffice Subversion repository. The most active committers are: </p>
@ -558,7 +629,8 @@ blog</a> shows no posts in 2015. In the October discussion, Rob <a href="http://
bark but the caravan moves on.</span>" That may be true, but, in this case, the caravan does not appear to be moving with any great speed. </p>
<p> Anything can happen in the free-software development world; it is entirely possible that a reinvigorated OpenOffice.org may yet give LibreOffice a run for its money. But something will clearly have to change to bring that future around. As things stand now, it is hard not to conclude that LibreOffice has won the battle for developer participation. </p>
<p><a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637735/#Comments">Comments (74 posted)</a> </p>
<p> <b>Page editor</b>: Jonathan Corbet <br/> </p>
<p> <b>Page editor</b>: Jonathan Corbet
<br /> </p>
<h2>Inside this week's LWN.net Weekly Edition</h2>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637395/">Security</a>: Toward secure package downloads; New vulnerabilities in drupal, mozilla, openssl, python-django ... </li>
@ -567,9 +639,11 @@ bark but the caravan moves on.</span>" That may be true, but, in this case, the
<li> <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637398/">Development</a>: A look at GlusterFS; LibreOffice Online; Open sourcing existing code; Secure Boot in Windows 10; ... </li>
<li> <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637399/">Announcements</a>: A Turing award for Michael Stonebraker, Sébastien Jodogne, ReGlue are Free Software Award winners, Kat Walsh joins FSF board of directors, Cyanogen, ... </li>
</ul>
<p><b>Next page</b>: <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637395/">Security&gt;&gt;</a> <br/> </p>
<p><b>Next page</b>: <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637395/">Security&gt;&gt;</a>
<br /> </p>
</div>
</td>
<td> </td>
<td>
</td>
</div>
</div>

1
test/test-pages/lwn-1/source.html
Unescape Escape View File

@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
</center>
<p>
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4358676377058562";
google_ad_width = 120;
google_ad_height = 240;

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save